by
James E. White, Ph.D.
Director, The New Mathwright Library and Cafe
and President, Bluejay Lispware
©
Copyright 2003 by James E. White
Special Relativity and Conic Sections
When
an ellipse is presented as a "conic section" in the context of the
Euclidean geometry of
the construction
is simple and visual. There is a standard cone at the origin, and one selects
a plane whose normal vector is in the interior of the cone, and that does not
contain the origin itself. The intersection of the cone and plane is the metric
curve we call the ellipse.
This
construction determines other metric invariants such as the lengths of
major and minor axes, and the location of the foci, and it determines similarity
invariants such as the ratio of the distance from the center to a focus,
with the length of the semi-major axis, or another ratio that is known as
the eccentricity. In addition, the following properties of similarity
classes of ellipses are well known:
Each
of these properties of the similarity classes of ellipses actually characterizes
them. But the usual construction of conic sections as the curves formed by planes
intersecting cones in Euclidean
does not make it evident why they should be true. In this story, we give a geometric
and dynamic interpretation of the fact that the similarity classes of ellipses
satisfy properties (1) and (2).
Of
course one may simply settle for the observation that ellipses do have
these properties, as a straightforward bit of analysis done in Euclidean
shows. But, as we
said, that analysis does not usually offer an interpretation of the similarity
properties (1) and (2). In order to find an interpretation, we cast the plane-intersecting-cone
construction in the light of a certain hyperbolic geometry on
.
We will discover that the "slice" plane (that intersects the cone)
inherits in both geometries a Euclidean metric structure and gives in both cases
the same ellipses. And we see that each slice construction determines a new
ellipse by orthogonal projection to the plane perpendicular to the axis
of the cone and passing through the origin. This projection is the same in both
geometries. The latter plane also inherits a Euclidean metric structure, and
the new projected ellipse is the one for which the similarity class properties
will have interpretations.
These
new projected ellipses were always available in a purely Euclidean context,
but Special Relativity provides a clue that tells us how to restrict the plane-slicing-cone
construction to a certain family of slices for which the projected ellipses
(as well as the slice ellipses) give representatives from every similarity class
of ellipses in the plane. Further, when
we use the hyperbolic metric structure on
we find the dynamic interpretation of the similarity class properties
of these ellipses: the focus-locus property, and the focus-directrix property.
In particular, for the latter, each projected ellipse has associated with it
a "directrix" that has a dynamic meaning. We will see, among other
things for example, that the eccentricity of an ellipse is simply a speed
(strictly between 0 and 1 -- the speed of light) that determines its shape.
It
is convenient to use the language of 2+1 spacetime Geometry to develop these
ideas. In particular, we describe a thought experiment in Special Relativity
that gives the physical and dynamic interpretation for the fact that the sum
of distances from a point to the two foci is constant. There is also a dynamic
interpretation for the fact that the ratio of distance from a point to a focus,
to the distance from the point to the directrix should be constant, as well
of course as an interpretation of the directrix itself. In this view the "plane-slicing-cone"
description of an ellipse, is the first step in the description of a second
ellipse for which the famous similarity class properties listed above have straightforward
geometric interpretations. Since the projected ellipses range through all similarity
classes, we finish with the similarity class properties (1) and (2) for all
ellipses in the plane. In that context, we will also see the "conic sections"
as "conic intersections," the intersections of pairs of light cones.
This
story has two purposes. The first is to stimulate cross-disciplinary thinking.
It makes connections between Euclidean and hyperbolic geometry for which the
lexicon is the idiom of special relativity. And while the facts of hyperbolic
geometry and linear algebra that we need are fairly elementary, the physical
intuition required to apply them here depends strongly on the experience and
the imagination of the reader. The
section titled: Light Rays, Clocks, and Rulers: A Visual
Primer in Special Relativity is a very modest attempt to reinforce and
develop that style of thinking.
The
second purpose of this story is to recruit 3 dimensional Graphics as a heuristic
method that can illustrate the hyperbolic geometry of
,
and to support visual intuition of some elementary facts of special relativity.
For that, we offer a large number of experiments in the body of the Microworld.
But since we are experimenting with a new medium for the communication of mathematics,
we understand that some readers may not have access to the technology required.
So we will present the story here in two forms, an active form and a static
form. In both forms, you may print the story, page by page, so that you have
a hardcopy record to which you can refer.
The
first form is a Mathwright Microworld,
in which you have the opportunity to ask your own questions and experiment as
you read along in your browser. If you are on a Windows platform (Windows 98/ME/NT/2000
or XP) and you have an ActiveX-enabled browser such as Internet Explorer 5.0
or later, we strongly recommend that you read and interact in the Microworld.
The Microworld contains within it the entire text of the story. To read
the Microworld, please click the following link to get the Player,
and then start reading the Microworld. If you have already downloaded the Player,
then simply visit the Microworld.
The
second form is Static hypertext. If you prefer to read this story in
the traditional way, you may read and print the full text in your browser. If
you wish to do that, please proceed directly to the Contents.
In the static form, you will not have access to the experiments. That text is
supplemented with many illustrations of the outcomes of experiments, in any
case.